{"created":"2023-11-01T04:17:24.509172+00:00","id":2000148,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"dac1ceec-803e-4003-8717-cae7469ade5c"},"_deposit":{"created_by":13,"id":"2000148","owner":"13","owners":[13],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000148"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:mie-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000148","sets":["556:557:1203:1698802103577"]},"author_link":[],"item_4_biblio_info_6":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2022-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"65","bibliographicPageStart":"53","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"7","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"三重大学教養教育院研究紀要","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"Bulletin of the college of liberal arts and sciences, Mie University","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_4_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"前報（林原 2021）において論じたように、「女性は働くべきか否か」という問いは、この問いが論争的に解釈される文脈のもとで回答する限り、選択可能性命題（「働く」ことを選択できるにもかかわらず、少なからぬ女性が現在「働いて」いない）と比較可能性命題（「働く」メリットとデメリットの比較考量が可能である）という二つの前提条件の承認を強いる。そのため、これらの命題の承認を望まない応答者は、この問いに直接的に答える（回答する）のではなく、その前提条件を問い返す（反問する）必要がある。\n本稿では、林道義と田中喜美子が『諸君！』誌上で交わした1999 年の論争を取りあげ、「女性は働くべきか否か」という問いが応答者の反問を妨げるような構造を持っていることを示す。この問いに反問するため、一方の前提条件（選択可能性命題）をフェミニストが否認しようとすると、その行為は専業主婦に対する「攻撃」として「誤読」され、専業主婦に対する敵意が彼女に帰属される。このとき彼女は、自らに帰属された敵意を否定しようとするだろう。だが、敵意の否定は、「専業主婦は幸福ではない（だから敵意を持つ必要もない）」という主張を呼び込むことで、結果として他方の前提条件（比較可能性命題）の承認を意味してしまう。このように、「女性は働くべきか否か」という問いは、一方の前提条件の否認が他方の前提条件の承認を帰結するという点において、容易には反問できない構造を持っているのである。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"Hayasibara (2021) argued that the question “Should women work?” presupposes the following two propositions in the context of controversy. Presupposition (i): Housewives have the opportunity to work outside the home but elect not to do so. Presupposition (ii): We can compare the life of a working woman with that of a housewife, and judge which is superior or inferior. To give a direct answer to the question means to admit these presuppositions, so the respondent who is reluctant to admit them must retort the question.\nBased on a case study of a controversy involving housewives in Japan, this article shows that the question “Should women work?” has a discursive structure that hinders the respondent from retorting. The data shows that when a feminist who tries to retort the question denies presupposition (i), her act of denial is misinterpreted as an attack on housewives, and she is considered to be hostile towards housewives. To correct the misinterpretation, she would claim that it is unnecessary for her to have hostility towards housewives because she is happier than them. As a result, she turns out to be admitting presupposition (ii). In this way, denying one presupposition results in admitting the other presupposition, thereby making it difficult to retort the question.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_4_publisher_30":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"三重大学教養教育院","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_4_source_id_7":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"2435-9459","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_4_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA12884746","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_text_31":{"attribute_name":"出版者（ヨミ）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"ja-Kana","subitem_text_value":"ミエダイガクキョウヨウキョウイクイン"}]},"item_4_text_65":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ（三重大）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"ja","subitem_text_value":"Departmental Bulletin Paper / 紀要論文"}]},"item_4_version_type_15":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"林原,玲洋","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"HAYASIBARA,Akihiro","creatorNameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"「女性は働くべきか否か」という問いの反問不可能性――林道義と田中喜美子の主婦論争を事例として――","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"「女性は働くべきか否か」という問いの反問不可能性――林道義と田中喜美子の主婦論争を事例として――","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Why It Is Difficult to Retort the Question “Should Women Work?”: A Case Study of a Japanese Housewife Controversy","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"4","owner":"13","path":["1698802103577"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2023-11-01"},"publish_date":"2023-11-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000148","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["「女性は働くべきか否か」という問いの反問不可能性――林道義と田中喜美子の主婦論争を事例として――"],"weko_creator_id":"13","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-11-02T04:54:47.053791+00:00"}