{"created":"2023-06-19T11:36:30.971686+00:00","id":3495,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"97e90f43-3053-4c1e-88fd-c67183372e39"},"_deposit":{"created_by":13,"id":"3495","owners":[13],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"3495"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:mie-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003495","sets":["143:144:262:271"]},"author_link":["6293"],"item_4_biblio_info_6":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2013-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"324","bibliographicPageStart":"313","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"64","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"三重大学教育学部研究紀要, 自然科学・人文科学・社会科学・教育科学"}]}]},"item_4_description_14":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_4_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"In March 2010, the revelation of a series of sexual abuses turned a critical spotlight on Odenwaldschule, a\nprestigious reformist school in Germany. Since its founding in April 1910, Odenwaldschule has epitomized the \nspirit of the German Landerzienhungheim  movement, and has been regarded as a leader in German New \nEducation whose educational concepts remain relevant to the present day. As a consequence, the current surge of \ncriticism  is directed not only at Odenwaldschule itself but also at the Landerziehungsheim movement and \nGerman New Education at large. While many professionals, both theorists and practicioners, continue to support \nthese concepts and advocate their continued use in practice, the leading educational theorist Jürgen Oelkers \nclaims that this stance glorifies New Education and prevents its realistic assessment. He takes the radical line of\ncondemning both the Landerziehungsheim movement and German New Education at large as a source of harmful \nconcepts and recommends a clean break with New Education, especially with its educational concepts in a way \nof expressing itself. Oelkers, however, does not  condemn every practice of New Education. Thus, the two parties \nto this dispute share the common ground of believing in the necessity of educational ideals and of respect for educational practice.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_4_publisher_30":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"三重大学教育学部"}]},"item_4_source_id_7":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1880-2419","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_4_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA12097333","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_4_text_18":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"Revelation of abuses as a watershed in German New Education : Abandon or continue the tradition?"}]},"item_4_text_65":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ（三重大）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Departmental Bulletin Paper / 紀要論文"}]},"item_4_version_type_15":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"伊藤, 敏子","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"Toshiko, ITO","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-02-18"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"20C16236.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.6 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"20C16236.pdf","url":"https://mie-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/3495/files/20C16236.pdf"},"version_id":"ca5b6d78-cfe7-4f21-8be9-0a836b7a406b"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"新教育運動研究の分水嶺としての負の履歴？ : 「決別」と「継承」をめぐる論争を貫くもの","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"新教育運動研究の分水嶺としての負の履歴？ : 「決別」と「継承」をめぐる論争を貫くもの","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"4","owner":"13","path":["271"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2013-04-16"},"publish_date":"2013-04-16","publish_status":"0","recid":"3495","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["新教育運動研究の分水嶺としての負の履歴？ : 「決別」と「継承」をめぐる論争を貫くもの"],"weko_creator_id":"13","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-11-09T05:27:08.768027+00:00"}