{"created":"2023-06-19T11:39:07.589167+00:00","id":7054,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"b87838ac-1f37-4765-babe-9f0bd0f9aee0"},"_deposit":{"created_by":15,"id":"7054","owners":[15],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"7054"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:mie-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00007054","sets":["6:580:1692593030162"]},"author_link":["16471"],"control_number":"7054","item_8_biblio_info_6":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2011-04-22","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"}}]},"item_8_description_14":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_8_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"対質権、強制手続請求権をめぐる議論の分析と調査から、アメリカにおいては、被害者保護が要求される場面でも、訴追側が一方的に有罪方向に傾いた立証を行うことへの批判的な姿勢が貫かれており、被告人に対して証人尋問手続を手続的に保障し、公判外供述の使用に関しては、被告人側ではなく訴追側に片面的な負担を課すことで、無罪推定のもとでの被告人の権利保障と真実発見の利益とのバランスがとられていることを明らかにし、それに照らして、日本での調書の用い方について提言を行った。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"In this study, I made clear that one-sided condemnation by the prosecution side was prevented strongly under the Confrontation Clause and the Compulsory Process Clause. In addition, a witness questioning procedure was guaranteed the defendant \"\"procedurally\"\", and it became clear about the use of out of court statements that the balance of the defendants right and the profit of the truth discovery was kept under Presumption of Inocence by imposing a one side-like burden on the prosecution side. Finally, I proposed it about the usage of out of court statements in Japan.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_8_description_5":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"平成19~22年度科学研究費補助金(若手研究(B))研究成果報告書","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_8_description_64":{"attribute_name":"科研費番号","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"19730055","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_8_publisher_30":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"三重大学"}]},"item_8_text_18":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Study on the Witness Examination and Hearsay under the lay judge system."}]},"item_8_text_65":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ（三重大）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Kaken / 科研費報告書"}]},"item_8_version_type_15":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"伊藤, 睦","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"ITO, Mutsumi","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-02-18"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"10K16725.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"321.4 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"10K16725.pdf","url":"https://mie-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/7054/files/10K16725.pdf"},"version_id":"689976a6-7325-4ef4-baeb-815385a3d9ec"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"証人審問権","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"伝聞法則","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"research report","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18ws"}]},"item_title":"裁判員制度の下における証人尋問の意義と調書の用い方に関する研究","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"裁判員制度の下における証人尋問の意義と調書の用い方に関する研究","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"8","owner":"15","path":["1692593030162"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2014-03-10"},"publish_date":"2014-03-10","publish_status":"0","recid":"7054","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["裁判員制度の下における証人尋問の意義と調書の用い方に関する研究"],"weko_creator_id":"15","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-10-18T02:21:18.304433+00:00"}