ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 20 教育学部・教育学研究科
  2. 20C 紀要
  3. 三重大学教育学部研究紀要. 自然科学・人文科学・社会科学・教育科学・教育実践
  4. 72 (2021)

「宇宙のセメント」説と蓋然性の論理学 -ヒュームの因果論の二側面-

http://hdl.handle.net/10076/00019749
http://hdl.handle.net/10076/00019749
9477747c-596f-4e78-b87f-61696bf16e43
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
2021BS0014.pdf 2021BS0014.pdf (1.6 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2021-09-06
タイトル
タイトル 「宇宙のセメント」説と蓋然性の論理学 -ヒュームの因果論の二側面-
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル The ‘Cement of the Universe’ View and the Logic of Probability: The Two Aspects of Hume’s Theory of Causation
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 秋元, ひろと

× 秋元, ひろと

ja 秋元, ひろと

ja-Kana アキモト, ヒロト

en Akimoto, Hiroto

Search repository
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 In the Abstract of his Treatise of Human nature, David Hume, talking about the principles of association of ideas, says that “they are really to us the cement of the universe.” Given that causation is one of the principles of association, it was a point of his theory of causation to show that causation, which makes it possible for us to cement one objects with another in the universe, resolves itself into association of ideas. This aspect of his theory of causation may be called the ‘cement of the universe’view.
In the Abstract, talking about “a defect in the common system of logic,” which pays much less attention to probabilities than to demonstrations, Hume says that he “has endeavoured, as much as he can, to supply it [the defect],” Given that, Part 3 of Book 1 of the Treatise, entitled “Of Knowledge and Probability,” is composed largely of discussions concerning causation, it was another point of his theory of causation to establish the logic of probability.
In this paper, I argue that his epistemological, rather than metaphysical, interest in causation led Hume to develop his theory of causation as the ‘cement of the universe’ view, on the one hand, and the logic of probability, on the other. In connection with this, I also take up the so-called “New Hume” debate, a debate as to the appropriateness of the interpretation of Hume as a causal relist, and argue that insofar as such a metaphysical issue as whether or not causation exists, independent of us, in objects was not a central concern of his theory of causation, the realist interpretations miss the mark.
書誌情報 三重大学教育学部研究紀要 自然科学・人文科学・社会科学・教育科学・教育実践
en : Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Mie University. Natural Science, Humanities, Social Science, Education, Educational Practice

巻 72, p. 97-125, 発行日 2021-02-26
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 1880-2419
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA12097333
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
出版者
出版者 三重大学教育学部
出版者(ヨミ)
値 ミエダイガクキョウイクガクブ
資源タイプ(三重大)
値 Departmental Bulletin Paper / 紀要論文
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-19 14:40:36.403686
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3