WEKO3
アイテム
Development of a questionnaire to measure primary care physicians' scope of practice
http://hdl.handle.net/10076/00017100
http://hdl.handle.net/10076/000171004c0c9763-3721-4c18-af67-57719309e7f8
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
2016DM003 (365.0 kB)
|
|
Item type | 学位論文 / Thesis or Dissertation(1) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-11-07 | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
タイトル | Development of a questionnaire to measure primary care physicians' scope of practice | |||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||||
言語 | eng | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | Comprehensive health care | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | Primary health care | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | Family practice | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | Physician's practice patterns | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | Questionnaires | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | Validation studies | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06 | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | doctoral thesis | |||||||||||
アクセス権 | ||||||||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||||
著者 |
家, 研也
× 家, 研也
|
|||||||||||
抄録 | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
内容記述 | Background: Despite an increase in research devoted to primary care attributes, the patient benefits and educational aspects of broad scope practice of primary care physicians (PCPs) have not been well studied, due to a lack of validated measurement in each country. The objective of this study was to develop and validate the Scope of Practice Inventory (SPI) to measure physicians' scope of practice within the Japanese primary care setting. Methods: The questionnaire was developed in seven phases: 1) item generation, 2) consensus method for necessity of each item, 3) Delphi process for the importance of each item, 4) pilot tests to limit the number of items, 5) preliminary cross-sectional study to examine factor structure and to validate the construct validity, 6) evaluation of internal consistency and intra-class reliability, and 7) evaluation of external validity. To confirm the interpretability of the SPI, the determinants of the SPI using a generalized linear model were evaluated. Results: Among 359 items generated by a focus group, 180 reached a defined consensus on face and content validity after the Delphi process. After deletion of items with Kappa values less than 0.6, 120 items were selected for the preliminary study. The principle component analysis using responses from 451 PCPs eliminated 52 items. The final 68-point SPI had three subdomains: Inpatient care, 25 items; Urgent care and minor procedures, 27 items; and Ambulatory care, 16 items. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability for total SPI and each subdomain revealed acceptable reliability. Male sex, less years since graduation, working in a hospital, sub-urban or rural setting, having remote experience, and having board certification as a PCP were positively associated with higher SPI. Conclusions: We developed a self-administered 68-point scale, the SPI, which had satisfactory validity and reliability. Primary care quality and educational research using SPI are expected to contribute to comprehensive and efficient health care systems in the future. | |||||||||||
内容記述 | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
内容記述 | 本文 / Department of Family Medicine, Mie University School of Medicine; Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh | |||||||||||
内容記述 | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
内容記述 | 9p | |||||||||||
書誌情報 |
発行日 2016-07-20 |
|||||||||||
DOI | ||||||||||||
識別子タイプ | DOI | |||||||||||
関連識別子 | 10.1186/s12875-015-0357-z | |||||||||||
フォーマット | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||||
出版者 | 三重大学 | |||||||||||
出版者(ヨミ) | ||||||||||||
値 | ミエダイガク | |||||||||||
学位名 | ||||||||||||
学位名 | 博士(医学) | |||||||||||
学位授与機関 | ||||||||||||
学位授与機関識別子Scheme | kakenhi | |||||||||||
学位授与機関識別子 | 14101 | |||||||||||
学位授与機関名 | 三重大学 | |||||||||||
学位授与年月日 | ||||||||||||
学位授与年月日 | 2016-07-20 | |||||||||||
学位授与番号 | ||||||||||||
学位授与番号 | 甲医学第1792号 | |||||||||||
ノート | ||||||||||||
値 | BMC Family Practice, 16: 161, 2015, ISSN: 1471-2296 に掲載 | |||||||||||
資源タイプ(三重大) | ||||||||||||
値 | Doctoral Dissertation / 博士論文 |