ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 20 教育学部・教育学研究科
  2. 20C 紀要
  3. 三重大学教育学部研究紀要. 自然科学・人文科学・社会科学・教育科学・教育実践
  4. 69 (2018)

特殊的な第二原因としての法則 ― スコラの因果論とデカルト自然学 ―

http://hdl.handle.net/10076/00017450
http://hdl.handle.net/10076/00017450
e76e18f9-204c-4ea9-bcfb-ad3ed56bb130
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
20C18253.pdf 20C18253 (2.3 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2018-01-18
タイトル
タイトル 特殊的な第二原因としての法則 ― スコラの因果論とデカルト自然学 ―
言語 ja
タイトル
タイトル Laws as Particular Secondary Causes: The Scholastic Theory of Causation and Descartes’s Physics
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 秋元, ひろと

× 秋元, ひろと

ja 秋元, ひろと

ja-Kana アキモト, ヒロト

en AKIMOTO, Hiroto

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 In this paper, I look into the scholastic background of Descartes’s physics, and try to make it clear where his theory of causation stands when viewed in relation to the tradition of the scholastic theory of causation. In section 1, I give an outline of the scholastic theory of causation based on Disputationes Metaphysicae (1597), written by Francisco Suarez (1548-1617), a leading figure of the early modern Spanish scholasticism. In the middle ages, there were three rival views on the relationship between God and created things as efficient causes. They are occasionalism held by Islamic theologians, and concurrentism and conservationism held by scholastic Aristotelians. Occasionalism denies created thigs efficient causation and admits God as the only true cause. By contrast, both concurrentism and conservationism allow causation not only to God but also to created things. Conservationism differs from concurrentism in that the former does not hold, as the latter does, that God concurs with created things when they operate as efficient causes, and restricts the actions of God as an efficient cause to the creation of things and the conservation of the things created. In section 2, I give a brief account of Descartes’s physics based mainly on Principia Philosophiae (1644), and take up the issue whether his theory of causation is to be interpreted as occasionalism, concurrentism, or conservationism. Scholastic Aristotelians made a distinction between God, which is the primary, universal cause, and created things, which are particular, secondary causes. Descartes also holds that God is the universal, primary cause. But it is the laws of nature and not created things that he regards as particular, secondary causes. Paying attention to this characterization of laws as particular, secondary causes, and its position between God and created things, I argue that Descartes, though retaining an element of cocurrentism or conservationism, advances toward occasionalism, which is going to be held by his followers such as Nicolas Malebranche.
書誌情報 三重大学教育学部研究紀要. 自然科学・人文科学・社会科学・教育科学・教育実践
en : BULLETIN OF THE FACULTY OF EDUCATION MIE UNIVERSITY. Natural Science,Humanities,Social Science,Education,Educational Practice

巻 69, p. 65-89, 発行日 2018-01-04
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 1880-2419
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA12097333
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
出版者
出版者 三重大学教育学部
出版者(ヨミ)
値 ミエダイガクキョウイクガクブ
資源タイプ(三重大)
値 Departmental Bulletin Paper / 紀要論文
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-19 16:36:18.047037
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3